• jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      They can bring some nice benefits like remote starting in cold (or hot) climates, but there needs to be much better design to minimize the exploitability of these systems.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        We had remote starters in the 80s, they didn’t need Internet access, they were a completely local wireless solution, just like old wireless garage door openers.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Remote starters that can reach from inside an office building to a distant end of a parking lot are underrated. I had this for about 6 months before the 3g network was shut down. Now, I’m limited to the range of a keyfob.

          Not to mention scheduled starts: say, 10 minutes before you have to drive to work, to make brushing snow off a car much faster, or 10 minutes before you leave work so you don’t give yourself a good sear on a random piece of metal in your car in the middle of summer.

          • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Agree on both parts, but the second part can still be achieved from an unconnected car, you just can’t do it remotely

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not a thing a car should require, and even for nice-to-have value-add features, it should be tightly secured, not only from external access but from the manufacturer.