• Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Tbh, if you’re working that high up the chain that O’Leary calls you personally, you probably are a very wealthy workaholic anyways.

  • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m sorry but I don’t think its that crazy to want your employees to communicate with you outside of working hours.

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Oh friend, that’s because you’re a moron. A lot of managers are, you’re a perfect example of that right now 😮‍💨

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s impossible for everyone in society to be smart. Sorry for your luck, friend.

    • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      If you expect them to be available outside of working hours, the hours they’re available should be paid, and therefore are working hours.

      There is no communication necessary for work that cannot take place during working hours. What you’re actually arguing for is free labor.

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        No, sometimes you just need to tell an employee something, and then have them verify they understand the information. In my opinion that does not qualify as work.

        • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          Is the something you need to tell them related to work?

          And is the verification you reference something you expect them to provide as an employee?

          I should hope you are able to make the connection without having your hand held further.

          • licheas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            on the off chance they’re…not…

            spoiler

            That’s work. and all work must legally be compensated for.

        • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          If your boss can’t figure that shit out during working hours they need to get their shit straight.

          I’m not going to be on call for zero compensation because you’re scatterbrained, inept or understaffed

          • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            4 days ago

            Because everything important happens during every employees working hours, and it is inconceivable that a plan could change for any reason while you aren’t clocked in.

            If you want work to get done you have to be coordinated. Just text back, its not that fucking hard.

            I would agree that your boss shouldn’t expect you to answer at all hours of the day or even remotely quickly, but if you literally never answer anything then I have very little sympathy for you when you get fired.

              • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                I think there is a difference between being on call and being expected to text your boss sometimes. You could literally just check your phone once a day at the same time and it would be fine. Maybe they should throw you a dime for that few seconds of grueling labor, but I don’t really give a shit.

            • eskimofry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              There shouldn’t be anything that requires the employee not be informed the next working day. If it’s such an emergency you can’t wait then you should call your doctor not your employee.

        • spirinolas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          If it doesn’t qualify as work then they can refuse. Maybe they don’t want to communicate with you outside the job and you have no right to force it.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 days ago

    Nobody should give a shit what another reality TV show host business marketing shill grifter has to say about labor regulations. He’s the last person I would care about an opinion from on the topic. Not seeing a link, did the article also include a response from labor leaders?

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dreams-crap-kevin-oleary-slams-110400900.html

      Unsurprisingly, the article is more nuanced than the title.

      For example, he states he has fired people in the past for not answering an after hours emergency, while the title seems to me to say he would fire people despite the new law.

      The article does include a response and background from labor leaders in Australia, as that is the most recent country to enact this law.

      But I entirely agree about his character, and he’s the worst person on that shark tank show too. I dont know ive ever agreed with a quote of his in an article.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    A lot of jobs need constant handouts from their work force just to get things done. But they usually find a way to handsomely pay those at top no matter how much workers are having to do extra. Shouldn’t be so much sacrifice and stress considering what top executives receive.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 days ago

    If it’s a new regulation to not answer phones off the clock, isn’t firing the employee for it illegal?

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes. But you can best believe they will find something else to fire you for. If you have nothing, then it’s an easy case win for you.