• Experimental Cyborg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Mastodon is gatekept to hell and back, the technicalities of federation are exposed to the user for some reason (you already lose half your potential user base right there), infighting between instances means that you won’t see the entire discourse of a post depending on which instance you’re at…

    And besides all that, bsky is not as “corpo” as mastodon fanboys make it out to be. They’re on track to open up to privately hosted instances as well, and you can already run most of their backend stuff yourself.

    • proton_lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      As much as I like the ‘decentralized’ stuff, the technical part of federation should NEVER be exposed to the end user if you want the platform to be mainstream. I still don’t understand why a lot of federated projects think it’s a good idea to expose that to the end user.

    • Trekman10@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think a lot of the attitude I saw on mastodon about this like a year ago was one of suspicion that they wanted an open network but didn’t use the fediverse standard

      • Experimental Cyborg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I assume the main reason is that ActivityPub is a mess and quite overcomplicated for bsky’s needs. Being permanently tied to it seems like a big risk. There’s no reason why they couldn’t make a compatibility layer later and hook into it.