I’ve been waiting to finish up with some major life stuff before diving into the world of 3D printers. Now that is finally behind me, and I am currently trying to find out which printer I want so that I can place an order.

So far I’ve set my eyes on the new Prusa CORE One. It ticks a lot of the boxes that I think I am after, including:

  • As open as I can get (before going into that Voron-stuff, which I think I’m not ready for). I don’t want to be bogged down with having to run proprietary slicers through Wine and things like that. I am not sure how big of an issue that is with e.g. Bambu or Creality (if at all), but I’ve seen enough rug-pulls and enshittification processes that I don’t really want to risk that. I want to be sure that I can use FOSS tools such as Blender and FreeCAD for design, and similarly open slicers, and the whole workflow will work just fine.
  • As future-proof as I can possibly hope for. I think the upgrade path from the MK4 to CORE One shows that they are serious about sustainability and longevity of their devices, and as far as I can tell, I should have no troubles sourcing replacement parts. I also want to support companies with this philosophy.
  • Has a decent print volume (I know there are bigger, maybe I will be constrained by this at some point?)
  • Enclosed - a major reason I did not want the MK4S was that it was not enclosed (but maybe you can get an enclosure?). It will be placed in my study where I spend most of my computer time (which often times is a lot, so I imagine I will be in the room while it is printing). I imagine, with the additional filter, that it will be better with an enclosure. Also, it will be easier to keep good temperature control during prints, as it can get cold here during winter.
  • Locally produced (I’m EU based).

I understand that other manufacturers provide more “bang for the buck” and that I in that sense will be overpaying feature-wise. I am fine with that given my emphasis on the above criteria.

However, I am a complete newbie to 3D-printing. I am sure there are some limitations I have not thought about, and I was wondering if there are any major things I have not thought about that would actually affect me negatively and should make me reconsider this model?

  • Miquel 🖌️⚔️👾@dice.camp
    3·
    2 days ago

    @cyberwolfie

    RE: Open-Source

    > in what way have you experienced any problems with this?

    For example, and I know is very niche, but I wanted to fix an issue with their app (I am an app dev), to discover that it isn’t FOSS like the slicer.

    Also as a CAD aficionado, I would love to get the actual step files and not just STLs.

    But don’t get me wrong, none of these was a blocker for me to get a MK4S.

    I am also not sure if I will upgrade to CORE, but that’s another story.

    • aardAEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      but I wanted to fix an issue with their app (I am an app dev), to discover that it isn’t FOSS like the slicer.

      Prusa has other software than their slicer? What does it do?

      • Miquel 🖌️⚔️👾@dice.camp
        1·
        2 days ago

        @aard most importantly, it notifies me when the printer needs my attention (e.g. change filament). My biggest annoyance (and what I wanted to fix/change) is that their app icon is not a proper vector graphic image, so it doesn’t look good in themed Android launchers.

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.mlOPEnglish
      1·
      2 days ago

      Ah, yeah, I would also have expected their app to be open source.

      Are the step files not generated by the slicer?

      • Miquel 🖌️⚔️👾@dice.camp
        2·
        2 days ago

        @cyberwolfie so what I mean is files that I can open on FreeCAD and can be modified to create my custom parts (step files), rather than importing an STL, which leads to worse results / more difficult to modify.

        This doesn’t affect me directly much, but it does affect the community as a whole, and it’s a step (heh) back from previous printers that do have the step files available.