• SoupBrick@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lawmakers and the White House have justified the crackdown on TikTok by claiming the app’s link to Beijing makes it a national security threat. But supporters of a ban have not offered direct evidence of the Chinese government ever attempting to obtain data from the company, nor any proof that authorities there have ever influenced content on the platform used by 170 million Americans.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure that the Chinese government has direct unfiltered access to byte dance Chinese servers, there’s no need to “attempt” to obtain data, they don’t need a judge or an injunction, they can just do it. It’s a different system from the American or European ones.

      • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The big issue is the US trying to ban Tiktok explicity for “national security” without showing the public a shred of evidence. What do you call it when China blocks access to an American app because of “national security”?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Lmao

      ByteDance publicly admitted they stored the user data in Beijing in 2023.

      The userdata includes location service, facial analysis, usage data, contacts, photo library, messages, and sound recordings in addition to the things people actually uploaded.