DytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 个月前White House Faith Officelemmy.worldimagemessage-square163linkfedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldDytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 个月前message-square163linkfedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·7 个月前Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·7 个月前You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
minus-squareroot_beer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·7 个月前Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-27 个月前You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
minus-squareMannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 个月前deleted by creator
No, totally unconstitutional.
Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
What’s laws, precious?
You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
lol
deleted by creator