Very good article

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    You will see stuff in a car, especially out west. Seeing things doesn’t really have relevance unless we are talking hundreds of miles per hour. A bike is slower than a car.

    As convenience goes, we are talking about using a bike, not going on a train.

    As far as comfort goes, a car is more comfortable than a bike. If you disagree, you only know economy cars.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have driven a lot in the west, and what you see is just automobile infrastructure, which is pretty much the same everywhere and incredibly ugly.

      The interesting sites require you to hike away from the roads.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      see things

      Yeah. The road and cars around you, if you dont have ‘a driver’.

      bikes not convenient

      Because you need to move to move? Yeah. Also, you can take it much farther on most trails than a car.

      bike less comfy than car

      Uh, okay. So walk? Stay on the train?