• solomonschuler@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The entire premise of me going on a fucking tangent trying to reclaim my privacy and identity is because of the invasiveness of AI. I didn’t sign up to Mozilla to be fed more AI bullshit, I did it quite the inverse. The fact that I can’t be left the fucking god damn alone from AI enshitification infuriates me.

    Am I going to need to build my own fucking web browser to avoid this shit?! Rhetorical question, the answer is yes, yes I will.

    Quick, I got 5 weeks of break before classes start for me again, if any developer wants to build a web browser from scratch with me let me know and ill make the github repo.

    Edit: on second thought we could implement our browser as a fork of gnome web instead of from scratch. GNOME web isn’t a derivative/fork of Firefox or chromium, however there are components from apple, like it’s rendering engine. Besides that, it’s not a bad idea to use

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    First: Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it. Second: our business model must align with trust. We will grow through transparent monetization that people recognize and value. Third: Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

    Are the first and third points not contradicting? Having control over AI in the browser means that the browser cannot be AI first. Maybe they need to step back and look at their core audience and a shifting user preference for less big tech and more control.

    I think the biggest thing that they can do is look at what the Firefox forks are doing and try and implement the features that led to people leaving. I’m using Zen not only for the addition features and UI elements it brings, but also the things that it chooses not to include.

    They can also look at what IronFox and LibreWolf do to create a new built in profile that maximizes privacy and security trading off convenience.

    Finally, they have failed to capture new users when google is blocking ad blockers. When you have a smaller market share you need to take advantage of your competitor’s mistakes.

  • gustofwind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve already switched to librewolf because of the ai update

    It’s really just a matter of trust and they’ve clearly chosen to trust ai first and users second. That’s why you must turn it off instead of having to turn it on.

    sad state of affairs

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off.

    How about you make it something people have to turn on, and make it useful enough that they will enable it?

    • XLE@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or add it to the list of onboarding steps at the very beginning. Otherwise, it’s either on by default or off by default, and our (or Mozilla’s) definition of “easy” is entirely open to interpretation.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or, better yet, step down as CEO. Pick someone who is in touch with what the project’s dedicated userbase actually wants.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Mozilla is a lost cause, and Firefox is too big to be rescued by one singular web-browsing development entity (that’s because the web has become too complicated so as to allow for terminal capitalism).

    The solution is, honestly, for a well-constituted organization to hard-fork the web standards model as a whole package, to start a sort of “re-web” project. Pick up something like gemini but iterate it to a level where it can actually be useful (gemini, nifty as it is, is actually less capable of layout and styling than the printing press from the 1500s and that’s saying something). Maintain a “convertible subset” of HTML+CSS as an input option for people who want to maintain and develop simple sites that might want to eventually convert to re-web.

    • kuneho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      gemini, nifty as it is, is actually less capable of layout and styling than the printing press from the 1500s and that’s saying something

      it’s like that by design, that’s the point of the protocoll

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah but that doesn’t really help much if the goal is “the web, but mote vintage of it”. My impression of gemini is it’s more like, to publish things you’d read on a beeper from the 90s.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dear AI Techbros.

    Why is AI in my browser something desirable for the common man?

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    What I want: a secure browser that does just that and nothing more.

    I’m so sick of AI everything.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    No. One. Wants. That.

    We have nowhere better to go. But that’s only for now, you short-sighted dumbass…