• Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      You forgot oil . Those executives cant get that 5th yacht unless innocent desert children die

    • sahin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      People are doing it for money, that is why it is so important to help the poor. When people are poor, they can do whatever a rich guy says

      • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I agree that it’s important to help the poor to make them less susceptible to financial coercion. After all, that is what capitalism does to quantitive measurements of debt, turns it from debt forgiveness to debt peonage. The second part isn’t necessarily true, there are plenty of poor people that don’t do what rich people tell them to, and plenty of rich people who happily do what rich people tell them to do.

      • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I agree that it’s important to help the poor to make them less susceptible to financial coercion. After all, that is what capitalism does to quantitive measurements of debt, turns it from debt forgiveness to debt peonage. The second part isn’t necessarily true, there are plenty of poor people that don’t do what rich people tell them to, and plenty of rich people who happily do what rich people tell them to do.

  • Dearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Isn’t this the 3rd time during the Epstein presidency that soldiers have been served their penultimate meal?

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Bro. The Epstein presidency has been running since the mid-90s. It’s a lot more than 3 times.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Approximately 45% of the available combat ready aircraft are in position at various air bases, which include carriers. One does not deploy and concentrate air assets like that unless you want the shit to hit the fan. Wasting billions for nothing.

    • ShergalFarkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is Trump’s MO, I think he was hoping for a lot more coverage from the media on this to drown out the Epstein stuff. I guess he thinks if he does order a strike, it will help take the pedo-heat off him, but it’d be the most foolish decision he’s ever made, Iran are not to be fucked with militarily.

      • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Indeed, another distraction. I’m going to laugh if the EU NATO members tells the USA our airspace is off limits.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        He’s not very good at controlling the narrative. Of course it helps to not actually commit crimes that everyone will hate you for.

        The media aren’t going to report that Trump has moved carriers into position because what’s the story “Trump has moved carriers into position they haven’t done anything though”. Nah, it’s either big explosions or they will go after the actual juicy story.

        Of course internationally the media get way more views for dunking on Trump than anything else, so they’re not going to drop the Epstein story until Trump is either convicted or he’s dead.

    • meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Focus that rage upward.

      I have such distain for our military industrial complex and ICE, but I recognize so much of the problem is desperate people taking desperate measures. They decided it’s better to risk your life in a foreign war than it is to be home watching you and your family whither away with no healthcare, education, or money. I don’t agree but I can understand- debt will put anyone in a pressure cooker. Two things can be true at once- being a stoog for American imperialism makes you horrible, but people who are stooges can still be people to show sympathy for when you consider the factors at play.

      When the revolution comes, as all revolutions do, it is only when the military allows the people to storm the gates. In my head we don’t need to thank service members as much as say I’m so sorry what this country did to them.

      • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I’m Persian, from Iran. I don’t give a fuck why those yank butchers signed up to go murder my family. They already killed my moms side in Iraq now they’re going to go kill my dad’s side. Fuck them and I hope they burn in hell. I wish they would skip to the part where they shoot themselves drunk and spare my family that remains in Iran.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          As an Iranian, I agree. Oh, poor baby needs to pay for college, so my dad needs to die? Disgusting ghouls.

        • meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Frankly, yea you’re right. Our military is absolutely brutally evil. And the reason they were there was to make the rich richer. Frankly when Americans sign up for the military, they should choose a branch and an oil company to serve as well.

          I can’t really convince you of anything else, other than know that most everyone I talk to knows we have more in common with you halfway around the world than either of us do with the people who send the military to kill. We don’t hate you, and I’m so sorry what they did to you.

          On this side of the world, keeping our class divided will only perpetuate this cycle. War is as profitable an industry as healthcare, so why expect peace or cures if the people in charge are only in it for their own gain?

          I’m so sorry for what this horrible country did. No one deserves that fate. But one day hatchets between comrades need to be buried and replaced with guillotines for kings.

            • meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Small story time because I realize the Neo-Futurists don’t seem to record their show and this should be in writing somewhere.

              Context: The Neo-Futurists are an experimental theater company based in Chicago but have spread internationally. They have a show where they do 30 scripts in an hour, so each “play” is like… 2 or 3 minutes.

              When I went they had one play called “How to Kill a King”

              The lights went dark. Then the projector turned on and said “put your phone and wallet into the bucket”. The cast came out holding buckets, and everyone did just that, including me. Then the cast left the theater with the buckets.

              Then the projector said:

              “Your possessions will be waiting for you in the lobby after the show”

              “Trust that you will have your wallet and phone back at the end of the show”

              “Trust that the people around you won’t steal your wallet and phone”

              “Trust that the people around you have your best interest in mind, and don’t wish you any harm”

              “That is how you Kill a King”

              And sure enough when we left, everyones stuff was splayed out on some tables and everyone got their stuff back.

          • Riverside@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yes, let’s listen to people living in the US constantly under US propaganda apparatus who won’t suffer the consequence of invasion instead of, you know, actual Iranians living in the country

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Iran is a horrifying dictatorship that deserves nothing less to be taken out with force. The only travesty is that American, on our own path of dictatorship and horrifying capitalism is the one who might do it.

          • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            We can take care of ourselves. Thinking that you can “take out” a dictatorship is absolute baby brain levels of understanding how the world works. A power vacuum is never filled by something positive and you support creating the conditions to make everything worse. Grow up.

            • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              You can eh? Then do it. I’m not so naive to think that uprising without outside intervention always succeed. Historically, outside support is very helpful for successful uprising.

              You can’t just take out a dictatorship. And I don’t think that. You need long standing dedicated occupation that builds up the country over decades to have successes like japan.

              • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                You have no right to invade and occupy other countries. All you yank fuckers will do is make everything worse and kill a lot of people. Why don’t you stay in your own fucking country and kill yourselves.

                • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I see you missed the part where I very clearly stated I did not want the usa invading iran. Saying that from a violent dictatorship is actually crazy, though. Really being a pot here.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Iran is a horrifying dictatorship that deserves nothing less to be taken out with force.

            To be replaced by King Reza Pahlavi, another dictator.

      • FatVegan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Nah. I wouldn’t go kill and rape people because a pedo told me to and gives me some crumbs. Destroying countless families to not even save your own, is a fucked up move and i hope they suffer real good for that decision

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seriously. I spent 4 years in the army and “surf & turf night” is nothing unusual. And desserts & pies are available every day.

    • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is the “You’re about to maybe face gruesome death tomorrow” meal. It’s one last pat on the back for morale before they send you to die.

    • Coldus12@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Not in the us either, but these are thought of as ‘quality’ foods (especially for soldiers), so its akin to them having a ‘last dinner’ of sorts before a deployment. Since middle east, and US has syrian (or iranian??) interests I assume its Syria (or Iran?), and that something big is aboutto go down there.

  • Tolc@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yankees going to murder more women and children, like they always do

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    298
    ·
    7 days ago

    They’re gonna go kill brown people to get the focus off of the richest ruling elite in the world (including their own commander in chief) trafficking, raping, and murdering children.

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Seriously? It’ll definitely work for more people than one dares to believe. It’s not about it working in the way you mean on us, the people that nothing will work on, it’s about everyone else. And for us that have functional empathy, conscience, intelligence etc. it will work in another way, we see the horrors about to happen. We see the people it’s going to happen to as actual people and anyone can only handle so much. It’s the classic “do or confess bad thing to make other bad thing seem less relevant”, and that works on everyone, just in different ways.
        I can absolutely see even here on lemmy being filled with news about this and less about what they’re doing this to take attention away from. It’ll work on me, no matter how much I don’t want it to, because I feel for the people who will suffer and die from this. And It’ll work on others in other ways.

      • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, we’ve already firmly established that the majority of the US still doesn’t care about these countries. I doubt it’ll be more than a blip.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        In the '20s, people considered Irish immigrants not to be white. It’s a meaningless label that people subjectively change the definition of just to other those they don’t like

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Irish people are like physically some of the whitest people in existence. All the Celts, Germanics are up there, very fair skin, starved of vitamin d for ages presumably they developed that skin to produce more when they did get sun.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          It’s not about white or brown. It’s easier for them to get support to abuse the brown people, it doesn’t mean white people are safe, or they won’t be working to hurt them. In fact everything they are doing is getting license to hurt white people en masse in the united states proper, while they steal elections, and throw protesters in camps, with courts unable to issue nationwide injunctions now.

          That said, the Iranians are basically white, without the head gear they would fit right in, Iran means Aryan by the way. From being settled by horse tribes from the steppes of Asia around 1,500 bc,

      • YTG123@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        It was never about skin colour though, was it?

        disclaimer for people who don't like to interpret internet comments charitably

        (even if it was, that wouldn’t make racism acceptable ofc)

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I love that disclaimer. I feel like I need to put it on everything. People seem quite incapable of separating descriptive and normative statements on here.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Sometimes I feel like people have misinterpreted all my social critiques as advocacy for the things I was critiquing.

            Like I’ll point something out, say “Society tends to do such-and-such,” implying, “and that’s wrong,” but what people hear instead is “as it should.”

            Like, I could explicitly state “and that’s wrong” all the time, but sometimes that would get a “no shit” reaction, or possibly come off as performative.

            Sometimes there’s just no winning…

            • tomiant@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Small minds, they are not used to braining. They think making a statement means promoting that thing. They think criticizing an argument automatically means you disagree with it.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Both true statements.

                Social justice topics are particularly sticky to navigate, especially as someone who isn’t visibly a minority. Like if I say “[such-and-such] minorities aren’t oppressed,” they’ll say “how dare you say that, yes they are!” But if I say “[such-and-such] minorities are oppressed,” they’ll say “how dare you say that, that’s so patronizing!” And if I don’t say anything, they’ll say “how dare you remain silent about the plight of so many people!” Again, there’s no winning.

                They think criticizing an argument automatically means you disagree with it.

                Yeah, I’m far more likely to criticize an argument that I agree with in essence but disagree in substance or method. Like, if someone is completely wrong about something and has no inclination of being convinced otherwise, usually I won’t waste my time. I don’t argue with right-wingers online anymore because there’s no fucking point, I don’t have the time and energy for that, and I don’t even visit the same spaces of the internet as them. The most I’ll do when I see them in the wild is ridicule them and move on.

                If I see a leftist arguing poorly, however, I’ll usually chip in my ten cents as to how they could improve their argument. Whether the focus should be slightly different, or there’s a better way to argue the same thing, or the premises could be more factual, or the logic more structurally valid. If I disagree about the nuances of their argument, I’ll present a nuanced argument of my own.

                But some people seem to think that if I’m arguing with leftists, then I must be a right-winger. That’s incorrect. If I was a right-winger, I would be spending more time in right-wing spaces and less in leftist spaces. I wouldn’t bother arguing with people who’s perspectives and worldviews are so categorically different from my own. If I wasn’t a leftist, I wouldn’t care if leftists online could be making better arguments.

                Also, more and more these days I find myself treating tankies like I treat right-wingers. They’re equally as deluded, irrational, heavyhanded, and authoritarian. They don’t listen to reason or facts and evidence. It’s all ideology, propaganda, DARVO, gaslighting, insults, and accusations with them.

                But I do still argue with them, because they’re so pervasive in left-wing spaces, and I don’t want them dominating the narrative. I want other leftists, less extreme leftists, rational and empathetic leftists, to have spaces where they feel comfortable having intelligent discussions without it turning into a tankie circlejerk.

                Example:

                When I was still on reddit, a few years ago the democratic socialists sub was overrun with tankies. Like, they already had all the other leftist subs, couldn’t they just leave this one that’s supposed to be the least extreme and most inclusive of diverse opinions? So I started arguing with them about why authoritarian behavior shouldn’t be tolerated there, that it’s a democratic socialist sub and should be treated as such. It caught on, and other peoplw picked up the argument. Eventually the mods had a vote on whether to ban ML harassment. It passed, and now MLs are still allowed there, but if they attack people for disagreement then they get banned.

                But tankies don’t actually engage with my arguments in good faith, they just call me a fascist because I refuse to kowtow to their moral pedestal-standing and ideological purism. And in effect, they water down the meaning of the word ‘fascist’ and make it harder to be taken seriously when I point to actual examples of fascism.