She was trying to do a fluff piece interview, and he was trying to drop hard facts. I’m glad he didn’t back down on his points.
Haven’t watched it but sounds like someone with strong convictions and an idea why things are the way they are. Hopefully eventually enough people recognize the fact that we need a functional society that allows the random person to feel comfortable. Cause if you get enough itchy people things get scratched.
Haven’t watched it
It’s a 30 second clip mate
30 seconds of sound when you’re pooping on the toilet at work, is 30 seconds too much sound. Hypothetically speaking.
You sit idly pooping while so much of the housing stock in the US is owned by hedge funds?
TPUSA
deleted by creator
I’ve been next to lads in the stalls where they’re dropping bombs and on the phone on the same time. No shame. Barely stopped to grunt. Truly Gods among men.
Pretty much I don’t care for random audio, I prefer text articles or comments to get the jist of things. I actually hate noise unless it’s for entertainment or another person (well sometimes I don’t care for that but polite society and all).
A 30 second video would be a nice short article.
A+ for staying on message.
As unhinged as social media gets, this is pretty much why so many end up trusting it over traditional media. The internet broke the veil of commercial reporting/journalism - media in general. Broke the trust on accepting public personas and not being suspicious of them behind the scenes. Sell out reporters/journalist/artists/etc are like scabs to labor strikers
-“Snow is pretty”
-“Mmhmm, so private equity owns…”
Basically trying to nostalgia bait people but buddy saw right through it and went in for the kill.
Legend. Came back to his point with a friendly smile, and plenty of grace
With a climate change kicker thrown in
They did streisand this effect very nicely without even trying.
She pulled back the microphone mid sentence when he refused to let the conversation get derailed.
Very sus
And this is why legacy media is legacy media.
Sounds like NBC needs to study and read socialist theory. Seriously! https://redsails.org/
They probably did, but decided to pick the side of the billionaire class/got told by their owners (the billionaire class) that they were to pick the side of the billionaire class in order to facilitate the continued exploitation of ordinary people
Gee, would’ve been a shame if NBC gets split and then to the workers who would then collectivize it. Seriously!
Can someone federate it?
Here is a tweet https://t.co/gUEj8HeHkF of the loops,video clip that is linked in this page https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/legend-yorker-turns-local-news-210000274.html
This guy is my hero
I wonder what New York would have been if Henry George had become mayor back then
Can’t let people say the truth, it would inconvenience your masters.
The news reporter wanted a feel good puff piece regardless of how inappropriate it is. The interviewee wanted to report the actual news.
Was it live? Probably not. That means they left it in on purpose.
Did you watch the clip?
Yes. But if they aired it, they aired it on purpose. Clips like that are rarely actually live. So they made a show of not continuing to give him airtime, but they gave him enough to get his message out - twice.
It’s says “Live” in the upper left hand corner.
They often lie about that. It’s usually pseudo live, as in, recorded just a short while before.
The company that owns that NBC affiliate wanted a feel good puff piece. I doubt she had a say in the matter.
Yeah, she’s just following orders.
We all know how good “just following orders” and “just doing my job” turns out.
But it wasn’t inappropriate…
To the holding company it is.
hoarding company*
🤌🏼
A misunderstanding on your part I thinks. I believe they are saying it was inappropriate to attempt to sanitize reality so they could release a “feel good puff piece”.
