

I was just wondering if he could sue for malicious prosecution.


I was just wondering if he could sue for malicious prosecution.


I’m glad DC juries aren’t putting up with Trump and Bondi’s fascist shit
I still can’t believe people lived through the first Trump presidency and decided they wanted another.


No, since it was my brother’s friend, I just told my brother that dude was a moron - and left it at that.


I live in Colorado where we just passed a resolution to pay for school lunches by a small tax on individuals making $300,000 or more.
I swear to God, there were a ton of people complaining about it. My favorite was a Facebook friend of my brother who posted “Why are we allowing people to vote on this who don’t make more than $300,000 a year if it doesn’t affect them? That’s not how democracy works.”
These people are fucking insane.
She doesn’t specifically mention conservatives moving. Her argument seemed to be that everyone will flee the socialist hellscape.
Her argument is that more people will move to red states as a result. I hate to break it to her, but increased population density is almost guaranteed to make states turn blue.
So by winning, Democrats are actually losing, making red states turn blue, so Democrats are winning. Suck it, commies!
Yes yes, by sweeping elections across the country, you’ve fallen right into my trap…
Thanks, the beards part was the context I was missing. I must’ve read the original comment a dozen times wondering why it was so funny to people.
I saw that too and it completely went over my head. What am I missing?
I am glad that this passed in California, but this whole thing makes me feel terrible for the outlook of the country. I’ve been interested in counter-gerrymandering and alternative voting methods like ranked choice voting for a while now. I had loved seeing some states like California and Colorado taking steps to better elections.
But of course, having better and better elections in blue states just allowed red states to have worse and worse elections to seize control at a national level. I don’t know how you fix this problem, other than to do what California did and beat them at their own game. I don’t see a constitutional amendment being passed to help any time soon.


He underwent a successful heart transplant in 2012.
I’m an organ donor, but my ghost-self would be so mad if I died and my heart went to Dick fucking Cheney.
Speaking of showbiz and feeding pets, I’m a big fan of Hamilton. So when feeding my cat, I often tell him “You’ve got a hunger. That’s alright, I was just like you, when I was younger.”


Lol I didn’t notice till I read your comment.


There actually was something in the article that surprised me:
The analysts also said consumers have paid for about 50% to 70% of the total tariff cost to date.
I was shocked it wasn’t 100% to 120%. The fact that any businesses are shouldering even a portion of the tariffs is incredible. I fully expected them to go “Oh tariff is 50%? Better charge the consumer 60% just so we get our cut.”


Cause Jesus spoke English, duh.
/s


Yeah, did other people’s computers stop having power buttons or something?
You suppose this guy thinks men shouldn’t be able to vote on women’s health issues? I bet he doesn’t see even the slightest conflict there.