• makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Boring has been great, honestly. I didn’t know how much I needed a president who just got things done and wasn’t making headlines every day.

      I wouldn’t say he’s mediocre tho. Domestically he’s had a fantastic first term. I hope he brings some kind of CHIPS Act level stuff like an axe to the housing market yet, at least something to tease for his second term. International results have been a different story, Afghanistan was a disaster but also a call that needed to be made (and should have been made before him), and his handling of Israel so far is appalling. I’m sure it’s more complicated than we know but still - let’s hope he makes some tough demands there before too much longer.

      In the end I agree with you, better than a GOPer and infinitely better than Trump in any of these situations.

  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah he’s better than trump for sure

    A blind and crippled hedgehog would be better than trump

    He’s nowhere close to great. Hes run back much of his campaign promises and he’s funding a genocide. The best thing he could do is say he’s not running and throw his support behind someone actually progressive and actually not half senile

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Anywhere, he would be. Using location as a barometer for left vs right, rather than the actual mechanics proposed, is bourgeois methodology.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you want to know where democrats fall, leftists are a bigger enemy to them than Republicans and Trump.

        • Pratai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          No they’re not. They just annoying. Like arguing with a child over which Marvell villain is the worst. It’s all made up, but you can’t tell them that.

  • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Stop confusing democrats/liberals with leftists.

    Democrats will probably almost universally agree that he’s been a good president. Tribalism is a hell of a drug.

    It’s the leftists that won’t. And speaking as a leftist, he’s done a lot better than I thought he was going to. He ended up pushing for more progressive ideas than I thought he would. Good for him. He’s been stymied by the courts and his own party on some of them. And that why I, as a leftist, think the democratic party is still (less) trash. They had a majority for two years. Did some stuff. Could have done more. You can be all “but but Manchin/Sinema” all you want, but I’ll bet all the money in my pocket against all the money in your pocket, than if Manchin and Sinema were to announce that yes, they’d vote to abolish the filibuster, there would be two other democratic senators who would come out and say no. And that’s fine as it relates to their world view. They’re liberals. They’re not leftists.

      • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Then I’m saying “at least he’s not openly fascist but the democratic party still fuckin sucks.”

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, I wish. But Democrats threw tens of millions of dollars to a “Pro-Trump” Dem Senate candidate in Tennessee. Mayor Adams, up in NYC, has echoed a host of the Trump “immigrant invasion” talking points, when confronted with bus-loads of women and children kidnapped and displaced by governors’ Abbot and DeSantis.

          Then you’ve got Sinema in Arizona and Manchin in West Virginia and even John Ossoff of Georgia demanding hundred of millions for bigger and more heavily armed police forces to clamp down on any kind of public dissent in their historically red states. Our AG is once again refusing to close the torture camp in Gitmo, while Anthony Blinken runs around the Middle East peddling advanced weapons systems to extremist governments in Saudi Arabia and Nigeria and India.

          You can “Trump would be worse” all you like, but this shit is truly awful on a scale its hard to overstate.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        And here comes “No TRUE leftist!”

        The right has RINOs so I guess the left gets to have LINOS or something.

      • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Eh, I’m of two minds about the strike. On the one hand, he got the rail workers their sick days after the fact. On the other, he really pissed me off and threw labor under the bus by making it illegal (again) for them to strike. You can’t be a pro labor president and take away labors most powerful tool.

        I don’t know anything about the BBB.

        100% with you on Gaza.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          the fact he made it illegal tells any leftist all we have to know

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          On the one hand, he got the rail workers their sick days after the fact.

          They were fighting for 15 sick days. How many did each of the 12 unions get?

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Don’t you want to at least see Biden in a last term with nothing to lose besides legacy? He’ll be term limited, plus his age… he’ll do something crazy to be loved.

    He’ll make weed legal if it isn’t by then… He’ll forgive all the student debt this time… He’ll expand the Supreme Court… He’ll do something worthwhile and he will continue to not be trump.

    Plenty of things where he misses my ideal, but generally positive progress and we keep pressure on for more progressive choices. General progress…

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    He has delivered the largest economic recovery plan since Roosevelt, the largest infrastructure plan since Eisenhower, the most judges confirmed since Kennedy, the second-largest healthcare bill since Johnson, and the largest climate change bill in history.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      and none of it matters because the other side thinks the work of government is to do as little as possible for the people it fleeces.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      And yet the quality of life for Americans is still declining, while the wealth gap keeps growing.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yep, and a bunch of the things Biden supporters want to tout are making this problem worse, because his economic legislation and climate legislation and healthcare legislation and all the rest is almost entirely just throwing taxpayer money at businesses and hoping it trickles down to us somehow

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That has been a trend for decades so it’s not going to turn around overnight. He has made some big steps by expanding numerous quality of life programs.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Real wages (i.e. inflation adjusted) have been growing for the last year and are now even with what they were before covid.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          In 2019 real wages were on par with what they were in 1973. That is no growth in over 50 years.

          Of course things are going to go back to pre-Covid levels post-Covid. That’s not a sign that things are magically fixed. Housing and food costs are at extreme highs, the amount of people working two jobs to survive are at highs, etc. etc. CPI also lags behind on many things such as market rent.

          And don’t even get me started on the generational gap, millenials, zoomers, and alphas are all far far worse off than previous generations.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That graph kind of sidesteps the actual problem. Inflation has run away so much that 1973 isn’t nearly enough. I know that seems weird because they used real terms but median wage increases since 1974 have lost to core inflation over the decades by over a hundred points.

            What we’re actually seeing here is the worth of money adjusting. But if you put core inflation on there it would be an even higher line.

            It’s worth mentioning that WEC is heavily pro-corporate and neo liberal. They’d love to push a graph that made it seem like everyone was panicking for no reason.

          • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Cool, what does that have do with Joe Biden’s presidency? You know, the one that started Jan 20, 2021 and is the topic of this thread.

            Massive systems, like the economy, don’t get fixed overnight. It took 40 years to fuck it up as much as it is now and it will probably take nearly as long to unfuck it.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Congratulations you swallowed a propaganda line that wasn’t even true when they printed it.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              BLS never announced that. An “economic” think tank did. Coincidentally the math doesn’t work out and it’s an election year.

              • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yes, they did. They publish data monthly on average hourly earnings of all employees. It doesn’t take a master statistician to take that and compare it against CPI-U and see that the average earnings one is now bigger compared against a Jan 2020 baseline. Do you want me to send you my excel from last night?

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would argue the quality has been improving as if late. But kind of hard to blame him for the fact that the world was gripped and massively disrupted a by a pandemic and the financial moves by the fed to stave off an even worse financial melt down led to high inflation. But we’re going in the right direction, even if it isn’t fast enough for some people.

        • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wages aren’t keeping up with inflation for most people. The wage increases reported are mostly driven by top earners. It isn’t moving at the bottom. Longer lines than ever at food pantries. I remember when Democrats used to at least pretend to give a shit about that stuff.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Whose wages?

                Even without answering that question let’s take a look at the 2023 numbers. According to BLS weekly wages went from 55k to 59k a seven percent increase. Inflation was 3.4. So we regained 3.6 percent.

                The pandemic alone was worth 10 percent. And we’ve been left behind by the hundreds of points over the decades.

                So while technically true, your statement is very misleading.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The poster said that over the last year, wages have out paced inflation. Pointing out how that is not true for years prior doesn’t mean his statement is misleading.

                  My comment, where this all comes from, was about how things are getting better as of late. So in context especially the comment is appropriate.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s not technically true, it’s just true. I specifically said “for the past year”, so bringing up “over the decades” is what’s misleading.

                  Especially in the context of Joe Biden, who has not been president for the past several decades.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Wages aren’t keeping up with inflation for most people.

            This is both very specific claim, but very vague as to what you mean. What is “many” and where are you getting these numbers?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This has been a decades long problem that he has contributed to over his entire career.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            More specifics please.

            But, ftr, we’re talking about his presidency, which has been way more progressive than him throughout his career.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              1994 Crime Bill, giving many people records and restricting their access to voting/housing/jobs/life.

              1996 one of 24 Democrats to vote for the Welfare reform bill that kicked many people off of government benefits and caused needless suffering.

              2003 American Dream Downpayment Act. It increased the amount of Adjustable Rate Mortgage you could get and made them available to low income families. This would prove to be a trap in 2008 that anyone with a basic education in economics could see coming because the rate was adjustable.

              That’s just three examples, I’m not going to keep going. This is an old problem, older than- Well I was going to say older than him but he was elected to the Senate in 1972. He has presided over the entire crushing of the middle and working class. And we put him in the white house for it.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              1994 Crime Bill, giving many people records and restricting their access to voting/housing/jobs/life.

              1996 one of 24 Democrats to vote for the Welfare reform bill that kicked many people off of government benefits and caused needless suffering.

              2003 American Dream Downpayment Act. It increased the amount of Adjustable Rate Mortgage you could get and made them available to low income families. This would prove to be a trap in 2008 that anyone with a basic education in economics could see coming because the rate was adjustable.

              That’s just three examples, I’m not going to keep going. This is an old problem, older than- Well I was going to say older than him but he was elected to the Senate in 1972. He has presided over the entire crushing of the middle and working class. And we put him in the white house for it.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Research constantly points to things getting worse, especially for younger generations. At best you could say the rate of decline has slowed somewhat recently.

          And it’s unfair to blame it on the pandemic, the trends been going on for much longer.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s not his fault it happened, it’s his fault he’s not doing enough to fix it. He campaigned on the status quo, yet the status quo is the problem.

              Fundamental change needs to happen.

              • maniclucky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                He’s not magic. He can’t actually wave a wand and do anything. He’s gotta get congress on board for anything meaningful that can’t be undone the second someone else sits in the chair. Incremental change sucks, but acting like he’s been doing nothing is dumb. That’s not to say he hasn’t done bad things (looks at Israel), but painting him as inept is disingenuous at best.

              • Wiz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Explain what changes can happen with Republicans in charge of the House.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  We could deschedule cannabi-- oh who am I kidding? We can support Netanyahu’s genocide even harder.

                • hglman@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I like how you can’t imagine a leader actually wanting change.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Trump sure seemed to change a lot with a divided Congress… Biden isn’t doing it because he doesn’t want to. But because he can’t.

    • MrTomS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Given the congress he has to work with, one could argue he’s been a better President than Obama was.

      • aubertlone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        He’s been a better president than Obama was.

        It’s not particularly close in my opinion.

        I’m hella biased, but the SAVE plan and not accruing interest on student loans as long as you make payments is a huge win.

        There’s no reason they couldn’t have done this under Obama…

        Edit: just wanted to mention that this restructuring for student loans had absolutely nothing to do with Congress

        • medgremlin@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The SAVE plan and the rules around PSLF really do make medical school a lot more viable for people like me. Doctors get paid a pittance in residency, and the interest on medical school loans would add up really fast on the old income-driven repayment plans.

          • aubertlone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Trust me I fully understand.

            I went to med school, finished back in 2018.

            If I never step foot into a hospital again it’ll be too soon.

            I work from home now as a cloud engineer for a large US-based mortgage company.

            I’m very happy now. I’ve already made my piece that my $350,000 in loans can only be solved by making minimum payments for 20 years.

            All that being said, a lot of people are in a different boat than myself.

            Their loans are much more manageable and I’m really glad they’ll be able to pay them off because interest isn’t accruing.

            Who knows? I make enough now that I’m actually going to have to sit down and calculate whether it’s worth it to pay the loans off myself or just make minimum payments for 20 years and have the rest forgiven.

            The SAVE plan and interest no longer recruiting is the only reason these possibilities are there.

            Otherwise I’d have to resign myself to making 20 years of minimum payments and hoping that forgiveness plan is still in place.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          In terms of stuff leftists want, Obama overpromised and underdelivered, while Biden underpromised and overdelivered. I’m not sure he actually delivered all that much more than Obama did on an absolute scale, but when expectations ranged from “1994 crime bill guy” to “at least he’s not Trump,” pretty much any policy that manages to edge past mediocre is a pleasant surprise.

      • Rookwood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Obama was generally pretty terrible. Obamacare was a disaster and about the only good policies he had were around car emissions, which were significant but still. If you factor in the amount of political capital he had in 2009 it’s sad really.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree too. Obama had charisma and was a great speaker, but policy wise Biden is much better.

        If Obama was firmer many current problems would not exist today. But it is easier to say now.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Obama had charisma and was a great speaker,

          And as we’re seeing now with Biden’s poll numbers, unfortunately, that’s all that matters. Doesn’t matter how many good things you do to help people, all that matters is whether you have charisma and a good media relations team.

          People are so stupid. Maybe democracy was a mistake.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Maybe democracy was a mistake.

            It probably works fine if the majority of your population doesn’t have either CTE from your sports programs, lead poisoning, or something above an 8th grade education.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I don’t think he’s been a great president. I think he’s a million times better than Trump, though. That applies to the last election, and some-crazy-how to the upcoming election, too…

    I want to go back to my timeline, where Sinbad starred in a movie about being a genie. Things made sense back then…

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Actually you poors are having an amazing time and everything is great, you’re just too stupid to realize it.”

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        On average, wage growth has outstripped inflation in the last 2.5 years

        fair

        so most people are better off, income-wise

        This doesn’t necessarily follow. Is it possible to run inflation vs wage growth for the bottom 2/3 of earners? Top-heavy growth could distort the data.

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I really only know lower-middle-class (family) and and upper-middle-class people (professional acquaintances). The lower-middle-class people I know do seem to be doing better since pre-covid (some had their unions negotiate decent wage increases, some got promotions into superivisory roles, some switched jobs with a big pay bump). The upper-middle-class people I know are doing much better, until maybe recently (some have been laid-off, but they may still come back on top).

          I do not currently know anybody with 2 jobs. I know people who work lots of overtime to increase their income though. I’m not saying the poor and lower-middle-class shouldn’t be making more money, I’m just saying they’re doing a bit better, on average. Real wages have not been stagnating or declining like they have in many long periods in the past.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re gaslighting yourself in the other way. There are two kinds of low information voters. The first kind uncritically worship their “side” because they’re misinformed about the vices. The second kind are cynical and critical no matter what, even when policies help them, because they’re misinformed about the virtues. The right tends to do the first, the left tends to do the second.

      There’s a reason why the most informed left leaning people are the most strongly in support of Biden. Including people like Bernie Sanders and AOC, both of who have praised him for governing progressively.

      • Crow_Thief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Im a low information voter because my information comes from sources that arent propaganda?

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Quite possible the most logically astute comment here, and lo and behold- downvoted by the outraged hive-mind.

        Go figure.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Meanwhile you’re a high information voter because you accept articles such as this one at face value as well as the opinions of politicians saying their side is doing a good job?

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Look, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with being a low information voter. People are busy, and reading endlessly about politics is an unproductive hobby, just one of many out there.

          But it is absolutely true that the most critical people on the left tend to be extremely vague on the specifics. Because they don’t know the specifics. And being baseline critical allows them to protect their ego. “Those powerful elites won’t fool me!” And don’t get me wrong, powerful elites are trying to fool you. But one of the ways they do that is by convincing you that nothing ever gets better. Nothing is worth supporting. That every policy is as bad as any other. Everything that looks good is actually secretly bad.

          Here’s an example. Lack of competition and enshittification is frequently in the news. Inevitably, someone will comment that “both sides” are corporate shills, and it’ll get a ton of upvotes. Anyone who knows anything about the current FTC knows that that’s insane. In a shocking move, Biden appointed a young progressive firebrand as the head of the FTC, Lina Khan. She literally wrote the academic article starting the super progressive New Brandeis school of anti-trust. This new FTC has been sometimes clumsy, but super aggressive against corporations. This was an olive branch to the far left. And it’s one of the many reasons why progressives who are paying attention begrudgingly appreciate Biden.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s nice and shows that we should continue to apply pressure so that they continue to put more progressive people and policies into practice.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Totally agree. But pressure is both positive and negative. It means rewarding good policy, not just criticizing everything. Biden has made many moves to satisfy progressives. But if none of it matters electorally, why even try? Why not go back to pandering to centrists and conservatives?

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                I reward them with my guaranteed vote, which happens to be guaranteed because the alternative is worse.

                • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The progressive vote is hardly guaranteed. It’s fickle, hyper critical, divided, which enervates us as a voting bloc. Conservatives are the most reliable voters, and, surprise surprise, they wield outsized political power.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Background: I supported Bernie in the 2016 primaries; I ended up voting for Hillary. In 2020, Biden wasn’t even my 3rd pick in the Primaries (Warren, Sanders, maybe Buttigieg and even Steyer.). I still voted Biden, despite a clear lack of enthusiasm because I know how much easier it is to break and corrupt things than to simply maintain it or build upon a trillion-piece puzzle.

    Overall, Biden has been a pretty great President if only for one simple fact: The genuine experience and expertise of his cabinet. When I think of Donnie, I think of Bill Barr, Richard Spencer, Mike Pompeo, and other scum of his cabinet. These people are psychopathic, smarter than Trump, and dangerous. While they’re incompetent in their actual roles, they leveraged their offices to incredibly nefarious ends.

    The true stars of Biden’s administration has been his advisors and cabinet: Blinken, Yellen, Garland, Austin, Kirby, Bill Burns, Jake Sullivan, etc. These are the people that keep the machine running. Who actually take advice from reputable experts in respective fields, like Dr. Fauci.

    So yes, given the bigger picture, Biden has been a great President; partly because of stability; partly because of contrast with chaos.

    And folks, yes, it’s campaign season now. Expect a massive influx of ads and opinion pieces and a general attempt to drum up energy and awareness to a crucial election. Don’t shoot yourselves in the foot; the right has massive megaphones of propaganda they’re using every single fucking day to distort reality. Don’t be afraid to push back.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Are all this “wow Biden was actually the greatest president ever but we didn’t notice” news that started floating around a part of his upcoming election campaign?

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was curious because of how unashamedly propagandist this article is. So I clicked on the author link. It seems this is the only article he’s ever written for this website (I hesitate to call it a news outlet). Also, it says he’s a former republican political consultant now working for the Lincoln Project. That’s apparently the name of a moderate republican PAC that is trying to fight Trumpism.

      So why would a political news website outright publish propaganda from a PAC without any commentary? I’ve never heard of the new republic before, but they seem to be an otherwise unremarkable progressive political magazine. I couldn’t say whether the new republic is getting paid by the PAC to publish this, or whether they just took it because it generally aligns with their own stated political views. I will say that, although it is mentioned at the bottom that the author currently works for the Lincoln Project, I had to really look for that. it also wasn’t clear to me at first this was a PAC. So in my opinion, proper journalistic ethical standards are not being upheld here.

      Given the article’s origins, it’s pretty safe to say none of this is genuine. These are moderate republicans who hate Trump, trying desperately to destroy Trumpism. If they truly believed their own article they’d be democrats. And if you’re here wondering if the article is worth reading, I’d say it is practically fully content-free. It’s all just hopium.

          • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            They didn’t say it was reputable, just remarkable, which doesn’t mean it’s good or accurate, just that it has had a place in the media sphere for a while.

        • sushibowl@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Good to know, thanks. I’m not too familiar with the American news media, although I know there’s a lot of it around. I checked them briefly and they didn’t seem all too different from e.g. Huffington Post or other similar sites, which is why I called them unremarkable. It’s interesting to see they have a long history.

          I don’t think this materially affects any of my conclusions on the article itself though.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Welcome to American media! Brand new dogshit media companies made to make profit mixed with century old names, bought and turned to shit to make profit!

    • MrBusiness@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      You know it! I’m just thinking what’s the point? I don’t like Biden, but I gotta vote for him anyway cause the alternative is way worse. I DO NOT want to go back to seeing 24/7 news feeds about Trump doing something worse each day or playing golf for the nth time.

      You know one of the few things I liked about Biden was that I was able to go days or sometimes weeks without hearing anything about him. Campaign seasons suck.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, the Biden presidency has been blissfully “boring”. I might have hoped for better, but I’ll settle for stagnant compared to 2016-2020.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Boring? We are involved in two major regional wars with constant threat of escalation, global economic chaos, and the highest inflation in a generation. Fallout from a pandemic, the feds have been raising interest rates to the point the whole economy is fundamentally changing.

          We are living through historic times. I feel like the world hasn’t been normal or “boring” since Dec 2019

          • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            All reasons why we need solid leadership. I’d take a 3rd candidate, but if its going to boil down to Trump v Biden, then its an easy Biden pick.

            • kava@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              i think there’s no scenario where biden wins this upcoming election

              the situation with israel/iran is gonna kill him. he enters the war in force, he loses election because he’s starting another war in the middle east. he does nothing, and he loses because he appears weak.

              he just had a press conference because the special counsel released a report saying he was mishandling classified documents just like trump. the report stated one of the reasons he’s not getting prosecuted is “he’s a well intentioned old man with a bad memory”

              i guarantee that’s going to be on attack ads all over come election time

              look at the republican primary in nevada. trump got removed from the ballot - so he told his supporters not go out and vote because it didn’t matter.

              so who won the primary? the options were nikki haley, tim scott, and mike pence. Haley got about 30%… but the winner with 63% was “none of the above”

              even when trump isn’t on the ballot, even when he tells his supporters not go out and vote… he still dominates.

              if you look at the polls- https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/

              trump is winning nearly every general election poll vs biden

              i feel like the democrats are sleepwalking into a trump victory by rallying behind biden

              only chance is some sort of legal action taking trump out of the race (which i find unlikely at this point) OR trump has a stroke or something

              • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                There’s too much good fodder for attack ads. Remember how he said he wouldn’t seek reelection?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago
            • Most important election of our lives, fighting for the sake of our democracy, literally everyone from Russia to China to Saudi Arabia is out to get us so we have to stick together, don’t you care about climate change, don’t you care about immigration reform, don’t you care about student debts and health care?!!!

            • Actually, the last four years have been incredibly normal. What are you even complaining about?

            Can’t believe it is both the Best of Times AND the Worst of Times. Crazy.

  • abracaDavid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Maintaining the status quo in the face of looming danger does not make you a great president.

    The best thing about Biden is that he is not Trump.

    Also we’re not only supporting a genocide, we’re footing the bill.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Big facts. History is gonna treat Biden like it treated Coolidge. Hes good at the appearence of doing his job but will be blamed for lack of action preventing what comes after him. Be it this election cycle or 4 years from now. Hes letting the fascists have their dress rehersal at the southern border and it’s far from the first time hes refused to go hard on fascism. It’s becoming a matter of when, not if.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m 37 years old, the bar has been in hell for my entire existence and more than likely a handful of decades prior

    • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      We’re Americans son, we’re built off of genocide and slavery. It’s the only way of life that we know.

      I can’t wait for the day that climate change truly wrecks this country of mine, like gods fury on Sodom and Gomorrah.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    He’s been ok. Way better than that last guy though!

    I feel that he is mostly honest and wants to do the right thing but he doesn’t always get it right. At least he tries.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      He’s got women and children’s blood on his hands from Palestine. He’s only ok by comparison to the other guy.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        For a president of a war mongering country like the US he is ok. But he is still a president of the US so murdering brown people is a sport for him.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Obama did pretty okay, I think he saved more brown people than he harmed with his diplomacy and middle eastern border strengthening policies. He was also reported to be very very unfriendly with Netanyahu.

          I can’t speak for Clinton, but the people on either end of his administration certainly were shit.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Obama was pretty bad on the war front.

            • Obama killed US citizens without a trial in foreign countries.
            • Continued and escalated drone strikes.
            • Violated the war powers act with respect to Libya.
            • Egypt coup + Bengazi was a massive failure.
            • Created power vacuum for isis to rise.
            • conducted military operations in foreign countries without their knowledge or consent.
            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Last I checked, before 2012 Egypt used to be under control of the very hostile and brutal Muslim Brotherhood and massive protests rocked the country since before Obama was even in power. To give you an idea of how bad the Muslim Brotherhood is, they literally founded Hamas across the border. Idk why everybody in this thread attributes literally everything that happened during the Arab Spring to the Obama Administration. News flash, those countries existed before Obama was president.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You are pretty much entirely incorrect. Before 2011, Egypt was under the control of Hosni Mubarak, a brutal dictator with mostly friendly ties to the U.S. The Egyptian people eventually revolted, and they were not happy with the U.S. afterwards; they pelted then Secretary of State Hilary Clinton’s motorcade with tomatoes and eggs when she came to visit after the uprising.

                The Muslim Brotherhood won the majority of the Egyptian parliament afterwards, and elected Mohammed Morsi as President, but their rule lasted barely a year before the were also met with massive protests. The military forced Morsi out and basically established a military dictatorship in 2013. There were always rumblings that the U.S. was working behind the scenes with the Egyptian military to destabilize Muslim Brotherhoods civilian government, but there’s no evidence of that. The Egyptian Military government then blamed the Brotherhood for a terrorist attack, a claim the Brotherhood denied, and banned the Brotherhood.

                The Muslim Brotherhood were repressive and definitely supported terrorism, but they did not rule Egypt before 2011. There were a small blip between U.S. backed dictators.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I could sit here and type a paragraph about how much worse the trump and bush admins were about middle eastern military conflicts, mentioning the USA hasn’t officially declared war since WWII, but that would detract from my previous argument that he was decent even without comparisons. The major policy change of his admin was respecting older mutually drawn borders that led to a lot of peace talks and diplomacy with his administration which frankly didn’t exist before. Obama was single-handedly responsible for multiple nuclear disarmament deals and treaties, notably Iran. When he tracked down and killed Osama Bin Laden with a strike team to minimize excess casualties, he received praise from Muslim religious leaders.

              Gaddafi took power in 1969 via violent coup and US Ambassadors were recalled in 1972. He started revolutions and funded rebels in like 8 countries, including the perpetually unstable country of Chad. Sanctions briefly relaxed after 9/11 in return for nuclear disarmament. Blaming Obama for the Libyan Protests and Rebellion, as a result of the Arab Spring, is like blaming the single extra straw for breaking the camel’s back.

              Did Obama live up to the expectations set by his 2009 speech in Cairo, Egypt? No. Did he sometimes side with monarchs and dictators? Yes. Did he do a good job? I think so, I can’t imagine doing anything differently.

              EDIT: Replaced some pronouns with names for clarity.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Obama bombed millions using drones.

            He is also OK for being a president of the US.