• ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    5 days ago

    I swear this is part of a wider ongoing experiment. “What’s the most comically ridiculous, most bullshit conspiracy we can come up with that the maga cult will believe”.

    Whoever is behind it: please stop. We’ve known for a long time now that there’s is no bottom to that well.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Good. Trump needs a lot more than the MAGA cult to win an election (I wish I didn’t have to keep saying this). If we can convince them to start spreading the rumor about bigfoot in Ohio to the point that Vance and/or Trump starts talking about it, plenty of people leaning right will say, “this dude is nuts. No way am I voting for him.” They might not vote for Harris, but they also might not vote at all.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 days ago

        Trump needs a lot more than the MAGA cult to win an election (I wish I didn’t have to keep saying this).

        But he doesn’t in order to seize power undemocratically, which is his real game plan here. Remember, the NAZIs never had more than 30-something percent support in 1930s Germany, either.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Okay, but that’s a totally different issue from what we’re discussing.

          Also, he doesn’t have the concentration of people to do it. January 6th happened because he was able to concentrate people in D.C. and was president at the time.

          • teamevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            No it’s not…if you think for a second that’s not the end game you’re going to be very disappointed when they steal the election

              • teamevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                We’re YOU in DC on January 6th? Cause I was for work and I’ve seen it with my own eyes

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  That is also not what I am discussing. I understand that you want to change the subject, but that does not work with me.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ideology for many of the conservative mindset is more important that principles. The Democratic leaning voters are the ones that can be fickle enough to stay home but the Republicans would still vote

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            The problem with all these “prominent” Republicans is I think they’re all liars. I think every last one will still vote for him come election day.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              If he wins that will end the careers of those coming out against him. There is no reason for them to do so if they are going to vote for him.

          • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I don’t hear any of that outside the prominent ones. The smaller local ones are dead set on voting for Trump in my neck of the woods. But we have the nutters like Matt Shea constantly siring the pot and North Idaho seems like a powder keg waiting to go off. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone doesn’t try another Ruby Ridge type standoff in the next 5 years.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              Okay? You were claiming all Republicans will still vote for him. That’s demonstrably not true. If big name Republicans aren’t going to vote for him, why are you assuming all other Republicans will?

              • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 days ago

                Because I talk to Republicans, like with my mouth and listen with my ears. I see the roadside Trump support. I see people hanging banners on freeway overpasses. I’m just being realistic because I don’t think conservative voters really care about what the Republican Elites are doing if those people aren’t MAGA morons.

              • Ark-5@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 days ago

                If I may project a little, I think the commenter is pointing to language that’s been cropping up essentially calling big name republicans traitors for endorsing Kamala. While you’re more than allowed to interpret what they said literally, I read it has intentionally a bit hyperbolic to make the point that a huge portion of the Republican Party will literally blindly follow him, even if the party leaders are starting to flake.

                Just remember, rewording this statement:

                If big name Republicans aren’t going to vote for him, why are you assuming all other Republicans will?

                To the version that would exemplify your interpretation:

                If big name Republicans are going to vote for him, why are you assuming all other Republicans will?

                Still creates an equally bold, and hyperbolic claim. Sometimes people use words like “all” and don’t really mean every last person. I blame the English language, not the people taking words literally, for misunderstandings like this.

                Just remember, especially with politics, people often hype up language a bit, it makes statements carry more oomph, and can help keep supporters excited for whatever movement they are supporting.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Indeed, at this point I’m expecting Trump to lose hard simply because he only has the MAGA cult and a few “Vote Red or we’re all dead” types

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Call JD Vance’s office and make up the most ridiculous shit. Say that Obama has been spotted shoving smaller gerbils up the asses of larger gerbils. The funnier we get this, the more “weird” Trump and Vance seem

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Say that Obama has been spotted shoving smaller gerbils up the asses of larger gerbils.

        Holy shit, that had me nearly crying with laughter!

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Sadly it’s a joke I stole from the “Deception of a Generation” episode of Cinema Snob’s CD-R Hell

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Old Internet thick. Very dense. Took memes and trolls lot of work dig through. New Internet thin. Memes go to top quick. Much trolling on surface.

      /S but kind of not

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yo. I called to say I saw JD fucking a couch. They pretty much have to make that public now or else it will seem like they have some sort of weir bias against immigrants.

  • chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can you imagine going out in public wearing a diaper with a big fake bandage on your ear yelling about people eating dogs

    I used to think furries were weird, they ain’t got shit on these people

    • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      5 days ago

      Most furries are harmless. A few are creeps with no concept of boundaries. Some are particularly deluded Nazis. Like every group of some size, they have a certain percentage of scum. Depending on your standards, they might be weird, but I’ll take harmless weirdness over harmful normalcy any day, let alone harmful weirdness.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 days ago

        We’re actually some of the larger donaters to animal based charities, I’ve yet to go to a furcon that didn’t make 10s of thousands for endangered animal rescue.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      When furries eat dogs it’s purely consensual, and they pass the harkness test when we do.

      Jokes aside, I’m a furry and even I don’t fully understand vore.

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      When I was a kid it was people saying the Vietnamese immigrants that were eating pets, and the Latinos were sacrificing them

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Can you imagine going out in public wearing a diaper with a big fake bandage on your ear yelling about people eating dogs

      Sounds like a normal night out in Dallas, TX to me.

  • EdgeOfToday@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    5 days ago

    Right, no one saw bigfoot because the Haitians ate him. There’s almost nothing the Haitians won’t eat. /s

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you call his office to say that you saw Democrats send Bigfoot to force trans surgery on hunters in the woods it will be his next headline.

  • patacon_pisao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Someone should warn them that an orange monster has been eating the brains of countless Americans, anyone eating cats has competition!

    • Sway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      He doesn’t eat brains, McDonalds doesn’t have brains on the menu. He just slowly poisons minds with his illogical gibberish.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Look, I’m an abigfootist too. But it’s just uncool to insult other people’s beliefs. There’s no proof that there isn’t a Bigfoot anyways. Let’s just be cool and accepting of their belief in Bigfoot, even if bigfootists are voting.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I admit, I have tried to figure out hypothetically how someone could get away with murder, and I thought going to another state, or even going to Mexico or Canada and then killing a random person would be part of it, but even then, you would have to do it from a distance because you might leave DNA on the body (they might fight back for example, get a bit of your skin under their nails or something). That would probably involve shooting a gun. Which is loud.

      Maybe if you found a way to poison someone without anyone seeing the both of you together…