• NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    Companies are stealing your computer’s resources (hard disk space, CPU time) to build their own Skynet and charging you for the privilege.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m scared from the possibility of linux going the same way… we tend to think it can be simply forked and continued on, but it’s a software too complex for some smaller group to maintain.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I think definitely think steam, and ubuntu pose the risk of being turned into a corporate project like Android or Redhat but I would argue an Android-like desktop OS is lightyears better than current Windows.

    • altec@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It runs like shit today. Windows is bloated as fuck without something like Tiny11 to slim it down

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dread every day I log into my work computer, not because I hate my job, which is one of the best I’ve ever had, but because I have to try to do it using Windows.

        • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          At least you aren’t having to manage your windows install. I feel for corporate IT departments having to figure out how to disable so much and still keep the OS running.

        • eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          You and me. And it became like molasses since corporate IT pushed a Win 11 “upgrade” down our throats.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    3 days ago

    “After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information.”

    Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lol so what happens if all your online stuff is automated?

      That means no mare ads.

      Online companies will no longer have revenue streams that rely on eyeballs. Probably another subscription service…

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Does anyone still larp stupid corpo PR?

      They are literally been caught lie after lie after lie…

      Deny the parasite profit.

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    This whole AI thing is starting to feel less like focused research and more like Free Jazz jam night at the local dive.

    • K3zi4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It could be used for amazing things, but it’s currently in that phase where it’s a rapid frenzy to make anything, regardless of moral and ethical implications, just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Imagine it was actually more open source and privacy focused. Yes, it would likely learn at a slower pace but at least it would be something more for the people rather than the big corpos.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        regardless of moral and ethical implications

        You are pointing on capitalism, not AI.

        just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

        Yep, capitalism.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Google doesn’t have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can’t even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    How do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.

      Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      They are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel.

      They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative.

      Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

      Because it is. That’s why it is called enshittification.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shareholders are the customers now. People are livestock to be milked dry, worked to the bone, and chopped up and served to corporations.

    • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.

      Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.

      You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.

      Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.

      You just aren’t the target audience.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    i guess it’s just puppeteer + ai prompting

    unless AI gets significantly better in the next year or so I doubt it’s gonna be any better than someone spending an hour writing a puppeteer scraping script

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Instead, you can directly give it commands in your browser and it should automatically do everything you need, including filling out forms and clicking buttons. AI-tasked examples include opening pertinent web pages, compiling search data into easily readable tables, purchasing products, or booking flights.

    This sounds like it would be great for people with accessibility needs—if only Google was trustworthy and had a fiduciary duty to humanity…

    Alas.